"Unfortunately, there are flaws in ILT. It measures day-after recall, which is equal to saliency; it's not equal to listenership. As a listener, you don't even know what the brand looks like. Typically, what gets picked up is salience, which really is the top-of-mind brand that you might have recently seen in an outdoor campaign. That is why you will see most radio stations do very lowest common denominator marketing - frequency and station name. But is that a way to build a brand?"
From an agency to television, to radio - Apurva Purohit has seen media from almost all sides of the table. Her move to Radio City was one of the high profiled people movements, marking the coming of age of radio as a medium. Today, when the FM space is crowded with numerous players and many more in the pipeline, Purohit takes stock of how far the medium has come and the way forward.
In an interview with Jagadeesh Krishanmurthy, Purohit speaks about life at Radio City, radio in India and life itself. Excerpts: Q. To begin with, the most recent development at Radio City, that of STAR’s interest in taking a stake in the organisation. What really would be the impact?
Q. What station do you listen to?
Q. So how can channels differentiate themselves and change the situation we have today - the same music on all stations?
Internationally, people differentiate on the basis of genres. They have jazz, romance, ballet, etc. In India, music is Bollywood music unless you say that I will play regional music. Let me quote an example here. In London, there was Capital Radio, Heart FM and Magic FM. Capital was a typical mass station catering to A, B, C; 15 to 45; giving all kinds of music and it was a large station for many years. Heart FM today is the No.1 station. Similarly, Magic is having very high numbers. What are these two stations? Heart plays only romantic songs for a specific TG which is 30-40 year-old females. And, in numbers it has got more than Capital. Magic plays a certain sound which is again differentiated from regular fare music.
When you look for obvious differentiators, you come to the conclusion that 90 per cent is Bollywood, 10 per cent will be English or jazz or regional. And, therefore, you will get too niche if you build differentiation. I am saying, delve a little deeper - you can actually segment and differentiate beautifully on target group.
Q. Are you doing anything internally?
Q. So you are looking at such psychographic or TG differentiations?
Q. Again on content, do celebrity RJs and such tactics make a difference to a station?
I think it depends on the kind of celebrity RJs. Now, radio is all about music and if you have a radio expert coming and talking to you, like Sonu Nigam or Lata Mangeshkar or Roop Kumar Rathod, speaking specifically on their core properties, I think, it works. Because, I want to listen to the creator or the writer of the song and I am getting it. Celebrities like these XYZ TV stars who come on-air -- what is the connection? People watch the TV stars for audio-visuals and that's why he is a star. So, in these cases celebrities don't work. The brand value has to match.Q. In terms of programming, Radio City has given various firsts to radio. You even experimented with shows. Does the theory of talk work on radio stations?
Q. What are the initiatives that Radio as an industry has taken to be more than just a frequency medium for any media plan?
Radio naturally has some strengths of its own, which haven't really come to fore now because of poor research in the market and the fact that we ourselves have undersold the medium. We have not marketed the medium well enough as an industry. This has led it to radio taking a slightly lesser position than what it could actually command because of the strengths it has. So that's one aspect where we have to work very hard as an industry, which is where research and marketing of radio is very essential. The other point is alliances which I spoke of earlier; we have to amplify radio power even further by using other support mechanisms.Q. Can we expect something very soon?
Q. Finally, a little on your personal side. How has the jump to radio worked out for you?
For me, radio has been a new medium and it has been very exciting to work on. I am pretty passionate about music and so I am enjoying it. I also got a good set of people to work with.
That said, at end of the day, for business heads, it's not about the product as much as it is about the business. A CEO wants to work on a business where he or she can leave a mark. They can clearly help grow it; they can help the people they work with grow; they value-add to different dimensions of organisation building; so it really doesn't matter so much what the product is.
Q. Please tell us how do you manage work and family life, and how do you de-stress?
Q. Speaking more on alliances, you identified potential in brand services and Vibgyor happened. What are other such initiatives can be expected from the channel?
We are very clearly looking at how to try and give more 360-degree solutions to our clients, which have radio strengths at the core and other things that can help the client take his brand story further in his interaction with the consumer. 360 can mean alliances with print or television but we are not talking about that. We are saying that there are certain strengths that radio and Radio City have. Let us come up with 360-degree solutions which amplify those strengths.
Now, what are the strengths of radio? Interactivity. Therefore, we are clearly looking at how we can extend that through the Internet. The other is live reactions or feedback an advertiser can get. Therefore, we have an activation alliance with Vibgyor. And finally, radio is an OOH medium, unlike television and print, and that's yet another strength. So we are clearly looking at Internet, outdoor and activation as things which amplify the strengths radio has and will take it further.
Q. But is such a brand personality really a strong enough differentiator?
Q. But in terms of recall, people do tend to remember the more nasty or controversial things...
Q. In radio, which is more of a hear medium, to what extent is revamp effective?
Q. Did the coming of new stations actually impact revenue of particular stations?
Q. But then cheaper options are available also with more players...
Q. On a different subject, the industry wanted to get together to form a consortium to look into issues facing it. What is the progress on that?
Q. Coming to research, could you tell us more on the reasons why you don't accept ILT?
I personally am a believer of research but, unfortunately, there are flaws in ILT. It measures day-after recall. As a listener, you don't even know what the brand looks like. You just like the song, you stay there. So, typically in day-after recall, what gets picked up is salience, which really is the top-of-mind brand that you might have recently seen in an outdoor campaign. That is why you will see most radio stations do very LCD (lowest common denominator) marketing - frequency and station name. But is that a way to build a brand?
ILT measures day-after recall which is equal to saliency, it's not equal to listenership. We have been telling ILT for one year now, to move to a system where you are at least able to give some audio cues. Last year, RED took up the whole issue of link-up in research. If people are listening to 'X' RJ and they identify the RJ equals 'Y' station and things like that, then we are talking genuine listenership.
After one year of personally talking with them, we have given up now. Forget currency, it's not even helping us in our programming.
Q. Once approval comes through of the stake, could we expect more happening between STAR India and Radio City?
Q. But that is the kind of promise that Big 92.7 made when they came on board - 'music for young adults'...
Q. Coming to the marketing side of the channel, how did the station revamp work for you?
Q. Looking at some industry developments: how has radio as a category grown in the last two years?
Q. How much radio do you listen to?