Michael Berland, President, Penn Schoen Berland
A level of authenticity is required today. Information is readily available, and if you don’t share something, it’ll come out anyway. So you need to be able to explain your motivations, so that people can form a connection with the brand. This is all part of the brand purpose, which you must reinforce through innovations in product and clear two way communication with the consumers.
In a conversation with exchange4media’s Gopal Sathe, Berland explained how the PR industry is going through a fundamental shift now and it is imperative that PR professionals start to think beyond media coverage and consider a larger brand purpose if they want to stay relevant by making an impact on a brand’s bottom line. Q. So the misuse of communication can create problems for products and brands?
Try to withhold or spin communication and you’ll just create a bigger problem. PR and advertising can make a good product great, but nothing can save a bad product.
For example, look at the BP-oil spill. The well burst was a big issue. The PR issue was the CEO trying to minimize something he may not have fully understood before he spoke. People saw through that and it created a second crisis.
A level of authenticity is required today. Information is readily available, and if you don’t share something, it’ll come out anyway. So you need to be able to explain your motivations, so that people can form a connection with the brand. This is all part of the brand purpose, which you must reinforce through innovations in product and clear two way communication with the consumers.
Q. How important is transparency and accountability in the new information age?
Q. How do you measure the value of a PR campaign?
What matters to the client is how you are making the difference and impacting the bottom line. Media coverage is just a very superficial measure of public relations. Our research conducted in India with senior communicators is actually showing the shifting need from coverage to business impact as one of top shifts in the needs of seekers of public relations services.
The measure for the effectiveness of PR should not be clippings, but rather should be the impact, in terms of buying and sales or in terms of perception, which can be measured through market research.
Q. How does a company deal with its employees being on social media? Do they need to have guidelines about this?
In a digitally connected world, every employee of a company is a PR responsibility – a careless word on Twitter of Facebook might seem harmless to the employee, but could seriously affect the company. Companies should not try and clamp down on the social presence of employees, but have clear internal guidelines on what they should and should not say in public.
Your employees are the best advocates for your company. They are the people who can tell the world about the brand and so companies must have some guidelines which are essentially common sense. It’s the same as your behavior in any public forum – if it’s inappropriate in a physical forum, it’s inappropriate in a virtual space as well. There is basic etiquette which must be followed that companies must cover, but in general, an employee is the best advocate for a brand.